The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

MiMo-V2-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 30.5 to 22.1.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 30.5 to 22.1, ranking #139 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2-Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 30.5 and ranks #139 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2-Flash
Xiaomi
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
30.5
#139
22.1
#202
Reasoning
30.6
#135
19.8
#213
Coding
17.4
#138
2.9
#241
Agents
8.0
#156
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
MiMo-V2-Flash
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
29.2#92
12.2#245
Tool use
6.2#164
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for MiMo-V2-Flash · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

3 shared

MiMo-V2-Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

305.0B diff

MiMo-V2-Flash has 305.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 7625.0% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
309.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2-Flash
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 10 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

10 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

1 days ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2-Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 30.5 to 22.1. MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2-Flash compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (30.5 vs 22.1), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons