Model Comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs GLM-5V-TurboWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Omni is 2.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: MiMo-V2-Omni vs GLM-5V-Turbo — which is better?

MiMo-V2-Omni (by Xiaomi) and GLM-5V-Turbo (by Zhipu AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

MiMo-V2-Omni outperforms in 1 benchmarks (PinchBench), while GLM-5V-Turbo is better at 1 benchmark (Claw-Eval). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2-Omni is roughly 2.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2-Omni also accepts a larger context window (262,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose MiMo-V2-Omni if…

  • cost matters — it's about 2.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,000 token context window

Choose GLM-5V-Turbo if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

MiMo-V2-Omni outperforms in 1 benchmarks (PinchBench), while GLM-5V-Turbo is better at 1 benchmark (Claw-Eval).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Omni costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($1.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5V-Turbo is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerXiaomi
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input tokens$1.20
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Omni accepts 262,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5V-Turbo's 200,000 tokens. GLM-5V-Turbo can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Omni is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input262,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both MiMo-V2-Omni and GLM-5V-Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5V-Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-5V-Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18, while GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02.

GLM-5V-Turbo is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2-Omni.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Mar 18, 2026

4 months ago

GLM-5V-Turbo

Apr 2, 2026

3 months ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi. GLM-5V-Turbo is available from ZAI.

MiMo-V2-Omni

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

GLM-5V-Turbo

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Xiaomi
Larger context window (262,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher PinchBench score (81.2% vs 80.7%)
Zhipu AI
Higher Claw-Eval score (75.0% vs 54.8%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2-Omni and GLM-5V-Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2-Omni
✓ Preferred
GLM-5V-Turbo
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Omni vs GLM-5V-Turbo.

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Omni or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Omni is made by Xiaomi and GLM-5V-Turbo is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MiMo-V2-Omni compare to GLM-5V-Turbo in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores PinchBench: 81.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 74.8%, Claw-Eval: 54.8%, MM-BrowserComp: 52.0%, OmniGAIA: 49.8%. GLM-5V-Turbo scores Design2Code: 94.8%, Flame-VLM-Code: 93.8%, V*: 89.0%, WebVoyager: 88.5%, PinchBench: 80.7%.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo?

MiMo-V2-Omni is 3.0x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2-Omni costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via xiaomi. GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20/M input and $4.00/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2-Omni and GLM-5V-Turbo?

MiMo-V2-Omni supports 262K tokens and GLM-5V-Turbo supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2-Omni and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Key differences include context window (262K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $1.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2-Omni and GLM-5V-Turbo?

MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi and GLM-5V-Turbo is developed by Zhipu AI.

Related comparisons