MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 25.6. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 14.7x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 25.6, ranking #29 overall.
On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is roughly 14.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- cost matters — it's about 14.7x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Muse Wonder
- overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
31 reported for MiMo-V2.5-Pro · 16 for Muse Wonder
MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 9.2x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 23.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Muse Wonder supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.
Muse Wonder can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Muse Wonder
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.
Muse Wonder is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Apr 27, 2026
5 months ago
Oct 12, 2026
-1 days ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Muse Wonder
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Muse Wonder.