The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M3

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 41.3.

Xiaomi · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 41.3, ranking #29 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniMax M3

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.28/M input and $1.10/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
45.7
#29
41.3
#54
43.2
#42
41.3
#50
36.6
#22
31.9
#44
33.3
#25
26.3
#52
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.10 / M
Context window
524,288

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiniMax M3
28.1#22
21.3#55
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 35 for MiniMax M3

2 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (OSWorld-Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while MiniMax M3 is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

119.0B diff

MiniMax M3 has 119.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, making it 38.5% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
428.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
428.0B
MiniMax M3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3 specifies input context (524,288 tokens). Only MiniMax M3 specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
Input524,288 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M3

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while MiniMax M3 was released on 2026-06-01.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4 months newer than MiniMax M3.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

3mo newer
MiniMax M3

Jun 1, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M3.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax M3?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 41.3. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and MiniMax M3 is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to MiniMax M3 in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. MiniMax M3 scores OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.6%, SpreadSheetBench-v1: 89.3%, USAMO 2026: 85.7%, Video-MME: 85.4%, VideoMMMU: 84.6%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M3 supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.7 vs 41.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and MiniMax M3 is developed by MiniMax.