The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 4.2.

Xiaomi · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 4.2, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.6 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.6
#29
4.2
#305
Reasoning
42.5
#45
4.2
#299
Coding
36.7
#21
9.7
#173
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.14 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 9 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

285.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 285.0B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct, making it 1187.5% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
24.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
24.0B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was released on 2025-03-17.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 18 months newer than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Mar 17, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 4.2. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, MMLU: 80.6%, TriviaQA: 80.5%, MBPP: 74.7%, MATH: 69.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.6 vs 4.2), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons