The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiniMax M1 40K

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 20.5.

Xiaomi · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 20.5, ranking #19 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.8 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniMax M1 40K

  • you are already invested in the MiniMax ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
MiniMax M1 40K
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
49.8
#19
20.5
#197
Reasoning
45.2
#30
20.7
#186
Coding
41.8
#9
8.1
#186
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiniMax M1 40K
Tool use
28.0#21
12.9#102
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 16 for MiniMax M1 40K

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M1 40Kdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

564.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 564.0B more parameters than MiniMax M1 40K, making it 123.7% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
456.0Bparameters
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
456.0B
MiniMax M1 40K

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 40K does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M1 40K

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M1 40K

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 15 months newer than MiniMax M1 40K.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.3yr newer
MiniMax M1 40K

Jun 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M1 40K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M1 40K
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiniMax M1 40K.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiniMax M1 40K?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 20.5. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and MiniMax M1 40K is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to MiniMax M1 40K in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%. MiniMax M1 40K scores MATH-500: 96.0%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, MMLU-Pro: 80.6%, ZebraLogic: 80.1%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 76.1%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M1 40K?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M1 40K supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M1 40K?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.8 vs 20.5), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiniMax M1 40K?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and MiniMax M1 40K is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons