The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Phi 4 Reasoning

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 12.0.

Xiaomi · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 12.0, ranking #18 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #18 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.0
#18
12.0
#260
Reasoning
46.9
#26
12.6
#249
Coding
41.4
#10
6.4
#196
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1006.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 1006.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 7185.7% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 17 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.4yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

—

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Phi 4 Reasoning?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 12.0. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 12.0), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons