The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 15.0.

Xiaomi · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 15.0, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.6
#57
15.0
#234
34.1
#35
5.7
#199
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning Plusdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1006.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 1006.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 7185.7% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 17 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.4yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 15.0. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.6 vs 15.0), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.