MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Sakana Namazu
MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Sakana Namazu are closely matched at 49.8 and 42.1 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.1x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Sakana AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Sakana Namazu are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 49.8 and 42.1.
On price, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Sakana Namazu
- you want predictable pricing at $0.95/M input and $4.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 3 for Sakana Namazu
MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Sakana Namazudon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 2.2x cheaper than Sakana Namazu ($0.95/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 4.6x cheaper than Sakana Namazu ($4.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Sakana Namazu is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Sakana Namazu's 256,000 tokens. Only Sakana Namazu specifies output context (256,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Sakana Namazu support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Sakana Namazu
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Sakana Namazu uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Sakana Namazu was released on 2026-08-03.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2 months newer than Sakana Namazu.
Sep 22, 2026
0 days ago
1mo newerAug 3, 2026
1 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi. Sakana Namazu is available from Sakana AI.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Sakana Namazu
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Sakana Namazu side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Sakana Namazu.