MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Solar Pro 4
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 35.2. Solar Pro 4 is 1.0x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Upstage · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 35.2, ranking #19 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 49.8 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Solar Pro 4
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 9 for Solar Pro 4
MiMo-V2.6-Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is more expensive than Solar Pro 4.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Solar Pro 4's 524,288 tokens. Only Solar Pro 4 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Solar Pro 4 does not.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Solar Pro 4
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Solar Pro 4 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2 months newer than Solar Pro 4.
Sep 22, 2026
0 days ago
1mo newerAug 6, 2026
1 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Solar Pro 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Solar Pro 4.