The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M1 40K vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

MiniMax M1 40K and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking are closely matched at 20.5 and 23.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

MiniMax · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M1 40K and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 20.5 and 23.8.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M1 40K

  • you are already invested in the MiniMax ecosystem

Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
20.5
#197
23.8
#174
20.7
#186
24.5
#158
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 5
4 of 5
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
65,536

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
MiniMax M1 40K
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
18.1#187
26.5#102
12.9#102
11.0#117
13.6#56
14.1#50
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiniMax M1 40K · 23 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

5 shared

MiniMax M1 40K outperforms in 1 benchmarks (TAU-bench Airline), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, TAU-bench Retail).

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

376.0B diff

MiniMax M1 40K has 376.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, making it 470.0% larger.

MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
456.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
80.0Bparameters
456.0B
MiniMax M1 40K
80.0B
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies input context (65,536 tokens). Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M1 40K is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M1 40K

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 3 months newer than MiniMax M1 40K.

MiniMax M1 40K

Jun 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

1.0 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M1 40K and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M1 40K
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M1 40K vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, MiniMax M1 40K or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

MiniMax M1 40K and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 20.5 and 23.8. MiniMax M1 40K is made by MiniMax and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M1 40K compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

MiniMax M1 40K scores MATH-500: 96.0%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, MMLU-Pro: 80.6%, ZebraLogic: 80.1%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 76.1%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M1 40K and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

MiniMax M1 40K supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M1 40K and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (20.5 vs 23.8), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M1 40K and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

MiniMax M1 40K is developed by MiniMax and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.