MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1
MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched at 48.5 and 48.2 on the LLM Stats Score. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 7.6x cheaper per token.
MiniMax · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 48.2.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniMax M3.1 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 7.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 7.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Muse Spark 1.1
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
14 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 11 for Muse Spark 1.1
MiniMax M3.1 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BabyVision, DeepSWE 1.1), while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).
MiniMax M3.1 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 8.3x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 7.1x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3.1 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Muse Spark 1.1 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Muse Spark 1.1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 3 months newer than Muse Spark 1.1.
Oct 19, 2026
-2 days ago
3mo newerJul 9, 2026
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Muse Spark 1.1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1.