The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.2 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 5.0x cheaper per token.

Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.2 to 35.0, ranking #30 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark 1.1 wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 5.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.2 and ranks #30 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 5.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.2
#30
35.0
#108
Reasoning
49.1
#17
36.2
#94
Coding
31.9
#50
21.0
#108
Agents
32.6
#37
16.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
5 of 5
0 of 5
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Muse Spark 1.1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Vision
34.7#14
20.3#86
Tool use
28.9#20
11.0#133
Multimodal
32.7#22
22.0#76
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Muse Spark 1.1 · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

5 shared

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens) is 4.3x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Muse Spark 1.1 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Spark 1.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark 1.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 3 months newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

3 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.2 to 35.0. Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 6.3x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.2 vs 35.0), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons