The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Phi 4 Reasoning

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 11.7.

MiniMax · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 11.7, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
48.5
#29
11.7
#278
45.8
#34
12.3
#267
37.8
#23
6.3
#211
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Phi 4 Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 18 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

—

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Phi 4 Reasoning?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 11.7. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Phi 4 Reasoning?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 11.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Phi 4 Reasoning?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.