Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 11.7.
NVIDIA · Microsoft · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 11.7, ranking #108 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- overall performance matters — it scores 35.0 and ranks #108 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Phi 4 Reasoning
- you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 0 benchmarks.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has 106.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 757.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Phi 4 Reasoning
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 18 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
1.5yr newerApr 30, 2025
1.5 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date.
—
Mar 2025
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Phi 4 Reasoning.
Related comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Wonder