Model Comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (ChartQA, MMMU), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (DocVQA).

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Apr 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

15.3B diff

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has 15.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 184.7% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
23.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
23.6B
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is 5 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Jun 20, 2025

10 months ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher ChartQA score (87.4% vs 87.3%)
Higher MMMU score (62.5% vs 58.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher DocVQA score (95.7% vs 94.9%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.9%, AI2D: 92.9%, HumanEval Plus: 92.9%, ChartQA: 87.4%, IF: 84.8%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.