The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct are closely matched at 8.4 and 6.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 8.4 and 6.5.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.4
#281
6.5
#295
7.9
#282
3.0
#305
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
11.1#245
3.2#288
10.1#124
4.3#161
13.2#103
6.5#134
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

3 shared

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (ChartQA, MMMU), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (DocVQA).

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

15.3B diff

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has 15.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 184.7% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
23.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
23.6B
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is 5 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Jun 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 8.4 and 6.5. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.9%, AI2D: 92.9%, HumanEval Plus: 92.9%, ChartQA: 87.4%, IF: 84.8%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.4 vs 6.5). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.