The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark Open vs QwQ-32B

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 45.3 to 14.3.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.3 to 14.3, ranking #42 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.3 and ranks #42 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
45.3
#42
14.3
#258
45.7
#35
15.1
#248
33.5
#40
10.1
#187
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Muse Spark Open
QwQ-32B
33.3#58
18.1#198
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Muse Spark Open · 7 for QwQ-32B

1 shared

Muse Spark Open outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

783.5B diff

Muse Spark Open has 783.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 2410.8% larger.

Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
816.0B
Muse Spark Open
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark Open specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark Open specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark Open supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Muse Spark Open can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark Open is licensed under Muse Model License, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Muse Spark Open is 20 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

5 days ago

1.6yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Muse Spark Open's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark Open's cutoff date.

Muse Spark Open

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark Open and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark Open
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark Open vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Muse Spark Open or QwQ-32B?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 45.3 to 14.3. Muse Spark Open is made by Meta and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark Open compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark Open and QwQ-32B?

Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark Open and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.3 vs 14.3), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Muse Model License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark Open and QwQ-32B?

Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.