The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Beam 1.0 vs QwQ-32B

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 14.3.

Reflection AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 14.3, ranking #46 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.6
#46
14.3
#258
45.5
#37
15.1
#248
33.7
#39
10.1
#187
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Beam 1.0
QwQ-32B
35.1#45
18.1#197
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 7 for QwQ-32B

2 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

468.8B diff

Beam 1.0 has 468.8B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 1442.5% larger.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
501.3Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
501.3B
Beam 1.0
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Beam 1.0 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Beam 1.0 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Beam 1.0 is 20 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.6yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

Beam 1.0 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B (2024-11-28).

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

1.6 yr newer
QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or QwQ-32B?

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 14.3. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and QwQ-32B?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 14.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and QwQ-32B?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.