The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder Full vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 12.0.

Meta · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 12.0, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.1
#13
12.0
#270
Reasoning
38.4
#71
12.6
#259
Coding
41.5
#8
6.3
#204
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder Full · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder Full and Phi 4 Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder Full supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

Muse Wonder Full can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Wonder Full is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Muse Wonder Full is 18 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

1.5yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date.

Muse Wonder Full

—

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder Full and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder Full
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder Full vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, Muse Wonder Full or Phi 4 Reasoning?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 12.0. Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder Full compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder Full and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.1 vs 12.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder Full and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons