The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder Full vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 7.8.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 7.8, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
52.1
#13
7.8
#298
38.4
#71
8.2
#291
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Muse Wonder Full
QvQ-72B-Preview
31.7#28
6.2#159
31.8#25
9.5#131
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder Full · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder Full and QvQ-72B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder Full and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Wonder Full is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

Muse Wonder Full is 22 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

1 days ago

1.8yr newer
QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder Full and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder Full
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder Full vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Muse Wonder Full or QvQ-72B-Preview?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 7.8. Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder Full compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder Full and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.1 vs 7.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder Full and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.