The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 16.3. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 6.3x cheaper per token.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 16.3, ranking #188 overall.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is roughly 6.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.1 and ranks #188 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 6.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.18/M input and $2.09/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
21.1
#188
16.3
#222
19.8
#193
17.3
#209
-6.7
#180
4.4
#154
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
5 of 6
1 of 6
Input price
$0.06 / M
$0.18 / M
Output price
$0.24 / M
$2.09 / M
Context window
262,144
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
22.3#139
18.9#175
3.0#101
13.7#54
14.0#130
18.4#96
14.0#113
19.9#68
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) · 50 for Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

6 shared

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Arena-Hard v2, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU-ProX).

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.06/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($0.18/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.24/1M tokens) is 8.7x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($2.09/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Input tokens$0.18
Output tokens$2.09
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.0B diff

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has 23.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking, making it 255.6% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
9.0Bparameters
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
9.0B
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 262,144 tokens.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 3 months newer than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

8 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Provider Availability

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is available from DeepInfra.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.09/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 16.3. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 93.6%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.5%, InfoVQAtest: 86.0%.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 3.0x cheaper for input tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking costs $0.18/M input and $2.09/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.1 vs 16.3), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.18/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.