The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 21.0.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 21.0, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.6
#57
21.0
#193
34.1
#35
0.6
#241
29.9
#38
-6.7
#185
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
262,144

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 15 for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

988.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 988.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B), making it 3087.5% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 9 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

9mo newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 21.0. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.6 vs 21.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.