The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 22.1 to 15.3.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 22.1 to 15.3, ranking #202 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 22.1 and ranks #202 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3 235B A22B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
22.1
#202
15.3
#253
Reasoning
19.8
#213
15.9
#241
Coding
2.9
#241
12.1
#169
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Qwen3 235B A22B
Math
12.2#245
20.9#162
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) · 23 for Qwen3 235B A22B

1 shared

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

231.0B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 231.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 5775.0% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
235.0Bparameters
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
235.0B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen3 235B A22B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 18 months newer than Qwen3 235B A22B.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer
Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3 235B A22B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 235B A22B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Qwen3 235B A22B.

Which is better, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 22.1 to 15.3. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) compare to Qwen3 235B A22B in benchmarks?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%. Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3 235B A22B?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3 235B A22B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (22.1 vs 15.3), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3 235B A22B?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons