The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 are closely matched at 22.1 and 23.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 22.1 and 23.9.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
22.1
#202
23.9
#189
19.8
#213
23.7
#184
2.9
#241
4.0
#231
-0.7
#198
9.9
#141
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.55 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
12.2#245
23.9#131
-2.1#205
5.6#167
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) · 25 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

1 shared

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

231.0B diff

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 has 231.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 5775.0% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
235.0Bparameters
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 was released on 2025-07-22.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 15 months newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.2yr newer
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Jul 22, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 22.1 and 23.9. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 in benchmarks?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 scores ZebraLogic: 95.0%, MMLU-Redux: 93.1%, IFEval: 88.7%, MultiPL-E: 87.9%, Creative Writing v3: 87.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (22.1 vs 23.9), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.