The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 48.1 to 21.8.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.1 to 21.8, ranking #31 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.1 and ranks #31 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
21.8
#203
48.1
#31
Reasoning
19.6
#216
48.5
#20
Coding
2.8
#244
33.2
#42
Agents
-1.8
#203
32.8
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Math
12.1#246
32.8#62
Tool use
-2.2#206
30.0#11
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

3 shared

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

121.0B diff

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 121.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 3025.0% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 2 months newer than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

6 days ago

1mo newer
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 48.1 to 21.8. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.8 vs 48.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons