The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nova Pro vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched at 12.3 and 7.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Amazon · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 12.3 and 7.9.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, QvQ-72B-Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nova Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
12.3
#252
7.9
#282
12.0
#247
8.2
#275
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.20 / M
— / M
Context window
300,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Nova Pro
QvQ-72B-Preview
18.9#173
9.6#253
5.6#150
6.3#147
8.4#126
9.6#118
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

27 reported for Nova Pro · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

1 shared

Nova Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QvQ-72B-Preview is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU).

QvQ-72B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

QvQ-72B-Preview is 1 month newer than Nova Pro.

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nova Pro
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Pro vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Nova Pro or QvQ-72B-Preview?

Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 12.3 and 7.9. Nova Pro is made by Amazon and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nova Pro compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Nova Pro supports 300K tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (12.3 vs 7.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nova Pro and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Nova Pro is developed by Amazon and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.