Model Comparison

o1 vs Gemma 3n E4B

Comparing o1 and Gemma 3n E4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

o1 and Gemma 3n E4B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B is 6 months newer than o1.

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.4 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

o1

—

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about o1 vs Gemma 3n E4B.

Which is better, o1 or Gemma 3n E4B?

o1 (OpenAI) and Gemma 3n E4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does o1 compare to Gemma 3n E4B in benchmarks?

o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.

What are the context window sizes for o1 and Gemma 3n E4B?

o1 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1 and Gemma 3n E4B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1 and Gemma 3n E4B?

o1 is developed by OpenAI and Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google.