The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Particle-1 vs Pixtral-12B

Particle-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.9 to -2.1. Pixtral-12B is 2.9x cheaper per token.

Particle AI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Particle-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.9 to -2.1, ranking #133 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Particle-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Pixtral-12B is roughly 2.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Particle-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Particle-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 31.9 and ranks #133 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Pixtral-12B

  • cost matters — it's about 2.9x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
31.9
#133
-2.1
#373
31.2
#135
-4.2
#375
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.25 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$0.15 / M
Context window
1,048,576
128,000

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Particle-1 · 12 for Pixtral-12B

1 shared

Particle-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Pixtral-12B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Particle-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Nov 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Pixtral-12B costs less

For input processing, Particle-1 ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Pixtral-12B ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Particle-1 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Pixtral-12B ($0.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Particle-1 is more expensive than Pixtral-12B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Particle AI
Particle-1
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Particle-1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Pixtral-12B's 128,000 tokens. Particle-1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Pixtral-12B is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Particle AI
Particle-1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sun Nov 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Particle-1 and Pixtral-12B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Particle-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Pixtral-12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Particle-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Pixtral-12B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Particle-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Pixtral-12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Particle-1 was released on 2026-10-28, while Pixtral-12B was released on 2024-09-17.

Particle-1 is 26 months newer than Pixtral-12B.

Particle-1

Oct 28, 2026

3 days ago

2.1yr newer
Pixtral-12B

Sep 17, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Particle-1 is available from Particle AI. Pixtral-12B is available from Mistral AI.

Particle-1

particle-ai logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Pixtral-12B

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Particle-1 and Pixtral-12B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Particle-1
✓ Preferred
Pixtral-12B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Particle-1 vs Pixtral-12B.

Which is better, Particle-1 or Pixtral-12B?

Particle-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.9 to -2.1. Particle-1 is made by Particle AI and Pixtral-12B is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Particle-1 compare to Pixtral-12B in benchmarks?

Particle-1 scores GPQA: 90.4%, BabyVision: 89.2%, MMLU: 86.1%. Pixtral-12B scores DocVQA: 90.7%, ChartQA: 81.8%, VQAv2: 78.6%, MT-Bench: 76.8%, HumanEval: 72.0%.

Is Particle-1 cheaper than Pixtral-12B?

Pixtral-12B is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Particle-1 costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via particle-ai. Pixtral-12B costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for Particle-1 and Pixtral-12B?

Particle-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Pixtral-12B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Particle-1 and Pixtral-12B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (31.9 vs -2.1), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Particle-1 and Pixtral-12B?

Particle-1 is developed by Particle AI and Pixtral-12B is developed by Mistral AI.