Model Comparison

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3BWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B — which is better?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 30B A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 2 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GPQA). Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Phi-3.5-mini-instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 2 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GPQA).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jun 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct costs less

For input processing, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct ($0.10/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 30B A3B is more expensive than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jun 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerAzure
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

26.7B diff

Qwen3 30B A3B has 26.7B more parameters than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct, making it 702.6% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
3.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
3.8B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Jun 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 8 months newer than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is available from Azure. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher Arena Hard score (91.0% vs 37.0%)
Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 30.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-3.5-mini-instruct compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct scores GSM8k: 86.2%, ARC-C: 84.6%, RULER: 84.1%, PIQA: 81.0%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is Phi-3.5-mini-instruct cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Both models cost $0.10 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.