Model Comparison

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AI2D). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Phi-3.5-vision-instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AI2D).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

26.8B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 26.8B more parameters than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct, making it 638.1% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
4.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
4.2B
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 13 months newer than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher AI2D score (86.9% vs 78.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-vision-instruct or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-3.5-vision-instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct scores ScienceQA: 91.3%, POPE: 86.1%, MMBench: 81.9%, ChartQA: 81.8%, AI2D: 78.1%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.