The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 6.6 to -3.0.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 6.6 to -3.0, ranking #290 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 6.6 and ranks #290 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-3.0
#332
6.6
#290
-3.0
#323
3.1
#300
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
-1.9#300
3.2#287
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.3B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has 1.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 18.4% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 6.6 to -3.0. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-3.0 vs 6.6), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.