Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct — which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct outperforms in 16 benchmarks (AITZ_EM, Android Control High_EM, Android Control Low_EM, CharadesSTA, InfoVQA, LVBench, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMBench-Video, MMMU, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, ScreenSpot, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMME w/o sub., VideoMME w sub.), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (AndroidWorld_SR, CC-OCR, DocVQA). Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 16 of 19 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

19 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct outperforms in 16 benchmarks (AITZ_EM, Android Control High_EM, Android Control Low_EM, CharadesSTA, InfoVQA, LVBench, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMBench-Video, MMMU, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, ScreenSpot, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMME w/o sub., VideoMME w sub.), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (AndroidWorld_SR, CC-OCR, DocVQA).

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.2B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has 25.2B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 304.1% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 1 month newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.4 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AITZ_EM score (83.1% vs 81.9%)
Higher Android Control High_EM score (69.6% vs 60.1%)
Higher Android Control Low_EM score (93.3% vs 91.4%)
Higher CharadesSTA score (54.2% vs 43.6%)
Higher InfoVQA score (83.4% vs 82.6%)
Higher LVBench score (49.0% vs 45.3%)
Higher MathVision score (38.4% vs 25.1%)
Higher MathVista-Mini score (74.7% vs 68.2%)
Higher MMBench-Video score (1.9% vs 1.8%)
Higher MMMU score (70.0% vs 58.6%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (49.5% vs 38.3%)
Higher MMStar score (69.5% vs 63.9%)
Higher ScreenSpot score (88.5% vs 84.7%)
Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (39.4% vs 29.0%)
Higher VideoMME w/o sub. score (70.5% vs 65.1%)
Higher VideoMME w sub. score (77.9% vs 71.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AndroidWorld_SR score (25.5% vs 22.0%)
Higher CC-OCR score (77.8% vs 77.1%)
Higher DocVQA score (95.7% vs 94.8%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.