The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Comparing Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Jan 2025
Jan 2025
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

471.7B diff

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 471.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 5690.1% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
480.0Bparameters
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
480.0B
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 0 month newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.6 years ago

5d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.