Model Comparison

Qwen3.6-27B vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxWhich is better in 2026?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.6-27B is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen3.6-27B vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max — which is better?

Qwen3.6-27B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.6-27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is better at 10 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, HMMT Feb 26, Humanity's Last Exam, IMO-AnswerBench, MMLU-Pro, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0). DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3.6-27B is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Qwen3.6-27B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 10 of 10 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

10 benchmarks

Qwen3.6-27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is better at 10 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, HMMT Feb 26, Humanity's Last Exam, IMO-AnswerBench, MMLU-Pro, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.6-27B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.6-27B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($1.60/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.6-27B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is more expensive than Qwen3.6-27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$3.60
Best providerNovita
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input tokens$1.60
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1572.2B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max has 1572.2B more parameters than Qwen3.6-27B, making it 5659.2% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
27.8Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
1.6Tparameters
27.8B
Qwen3.6-27B
1600.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.6-27B's 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3.6-27B is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input262,144 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.6-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max does not.

Qwen3.6-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.6-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.6-27B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.6-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.6-27B was released on 2026-04-21, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max was released on 2026-04-23.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 0 month newer than Qwen3.6-27B.

Qwen3.6-27B

Apr 21, 2026

2 months ago

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Apr 23, 2026

2 months ago

2d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.6-27B is available from Novita. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Fireworks, Together.

Qwen3.6-27B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.60/1M

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6-27B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GDPval-AA score (44.4% vs 38.6%)
Higher GPQA score (90.1% vs 87.8%)
Higher HMMT Feb 26 score (95.2% vs 84.3%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (48.2% vs 24.0%)
Higher IMO-AnswerBench score (89.8% vs 80.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (87.5% vs 86.2%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (76.2% vs 71.3%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (55.4% vs 53.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.6% vs 77.2%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (67.9% vs 59.3%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.6-27B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.6-27B
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.6-27B vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max.

Which is better, Qwen3.6-27B or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.6-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.6-27B compare to DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max in benchmarks?

Qwen3.6-27B scores CountBench: 97.8%, VLMsAreBlind: 97.0%, V*: 94.7%, AIME 2026: 94.1%, HMMT 2025: 93.8%. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max scores CodeForces: 100.0%, HMMT Feb 26: 95.2%, LiveCodeBench: 93.5%, MathArena Apex: 90.2%, GPQA: 90.1%.

Is Qwen3.6-27B cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

Qwen3.6-27B is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.6-27B costs $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output via novita. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs $1.60/M input and $3.20/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.6-27B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

Qwen3.6-27B supports 262K tokens and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.6-27B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

Key differences include context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.60 vs $1.60/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.6-27B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

Qwen3.6-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is developed by DeepSeek.