Model Comparison

Qwen3.6-27B vs Hy3Which is better in 2026?

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen3.6-27B vs Hy3 — which is better?

Qwen3.6-27B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Hy3 (by Tencent) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.6-27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy3 is better at 8 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, GPQA, IMO-AnswerBench, NL2Repo, SkillsBench, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified). Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen3.6-27B if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output

Choose Hy3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Qwen3.6-27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy3 is better at 8 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, GPQA, IMO-AnswerBench, NL2Repo, SkillsBench, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified).

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

267.2B diff

Hy3 has 267.2B more parameters than Qwen3.6-27B, making it 961.9% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
27.8Bparameters
Tencent
Hy3
295.0Bparameters
27.8B
Qwen3.6-27B
295.0B
Hy3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.6-27B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.6-27B specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input262,144 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tencent
Hy3
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.6-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Qwen3.6-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.6-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3.6-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.6-27B was released on 2026-04-21, while Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06.

Hy3 is 3 months newer than Qwen3.6-27B.

Qwen3.6-27B

Apr 21, 2026

2 months ago

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6-27B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Claw-Eval score (68.5% vs 60.6%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 87.8%)
Higher IMO-AnswerBench score (90.0% vs 80.8%)
Higher NL2Repo score (45.6% vs 36.2%)
Higher SkillsBench score (55.3% vs 48.2%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (75.8% vs 71.3%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (57.9% vs 53.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 77.2%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.6-27B and Hy3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.6-27B
✓ Preferred
Hy3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Tencent
Hy3

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.6-27B vs Hy3.

Which is better, Qwen3.6-27B or Hy3?

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.6-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Hy3 is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.6-27B compare to Hy3 in benchmarks?

Qwen3.6-27B scores CountBench: 97.8%, VLMsAreBlind: 97.0%, V*: 94.7%, AIME 2026: 94.1%, HMMT 2025: 93.8%. Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.6-27B and Hy3?

Qwen3.6-27B supports 262K tokens and Hy3 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.6-27B and Hy3?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.6-27B and Hy3?

Qwen3.6-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Hy3 is developed by Tencent.