Seed 2.1 Pro vs Seed 2.1 Turbo
Seed 2.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 46.2 to 43.1.
ByteDance · ByteDance · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Seed 2.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 46.2 to 43.1, ranking #27 overall.
In the 90 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Seed 2.1 Pro wins 74; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Seed 2.1 Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 46.2 and ranks #27 on LLM Stats
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 74 of 90 exact shared results
Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo
- you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
94 reported for Seed 2.1 Pro · 90 for Seed 2.1 Turbo
Seed 2.1 Pro outperforms in 74 benchmarks (Agent Startup Bench, APEX-Agents, ArcAGI2, Artifacts Bench, BabyVision, BLINK, BrowseComp, CharXiv-D, CharXiv-R, ClawEval-MM, ContPhy, CreativeWork, CrossVid, CyberGym, DeepSWE, Doubao Multi-Turn Bench, DynaMath, EmbSpatialBench, EMMA, ERQA, Finance Agent v1.1, GameWorld, GDPval, Humanity's Last Exam, Image2FloorPlan, KINA, LVBench, MathVerse, MathVision, MathVista, MCP Atlas, MeasureBench, Minerva, MMLongBench-128K, MMMU-Pro, MMSIBench, MobileWorld, MotionBench, MSQA, NL2Repo, OCRBench_V2, OfficeQA Pro, OneMillion Bench, OSWorld, OVBench, OVOBench, PresentBench, Program Bench, RealWorldQA, Repo Env, SciCode, SeedClawBench, SimpleVQA, SuperChem, SuperGPQA, SWE-Atlas, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1, TOMATO, Toolathlon, Trae Code Gen, Trae Error Fix, TVBench, VideoHolmes, Video-MME, VideoSimpleQA, VisFactor, VisuLogic, VLMsAreBiased, Web Bench, WorldBench, WorldVQA, xDailyBench, ZEROBench), while Seed 2.1 Turbo is better at 12 benchmarks (AetherCode, Beyond AIME, DUDE, FrontierCS, FrontierScience Olympiad, FrontierScience Research, LiveMathematicianBench, LiveSports-3K, MathArena Apex, PostTrainBench, WildClawBench, Workspace Bench).
Seed 2.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Seed 2.1 Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Seed 2.1 Pro
Seed 2.1 Turbo
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2026-06-24.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
Jun 24, 2026
2 months ago
Jun 24, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Seed 2.1 Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Seed 2.1 Pro vs Seed 2.1 Turbo.