The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo are closely matched at 40.6 and 43.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Xiaomi · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.6 and 43.2.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Seed 2.1 Turbo wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.6
#57
43.2
#43
Coding
34.1
#35
31.1
#49
Agents
29.9
#38
29.2
#40
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 90 for Seed 2.1 Turbo

1 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Seed 2.1 Turbo is better at 1 benchmark (Program Bench).

Seed 2.1 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Seed 2.1 Turbo uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Seed 2.1 Turbo was released on 2026-06-24.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3 months newer than Seed 2.1 Turbo.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

3mo newer
Seed 2.1 Turbo

Jun 24, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Seed 2.1 Turbo.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.6 and 43.2. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Seed 2.1 Turbo is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to Seed 2.1 Turbo in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%. Seed 2.1 Turbo scores CharXiv-D: 94.6%, MathVision: 92.7%, MathVista: 90.5%, MathVerse: 89.2%, Video-MME: 89.0%.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.6 vs 43.2), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Seed 2.1 Turbo is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons