The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 43.2.

Xiaomi · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 43.2, ranking #29 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.7
#29
43.2
#43
Reasoning
43.2
#42
44.5
#34
Coding
36.6
#22
31.1
#48
Agents
33.3
#25
29.2
#40
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Tool use
28.1#22
21.3#53
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 90 for Seed 2.1 Turbo

3 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (CyberGym, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Seed 2.1 Turbo is better at 1 benchmark (Program Bench).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.1 Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Seed 2.1 Turbo uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Seed 2.1 Turbo was released on 2026-06-24.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3 months newer than Seed 2.1 Turbo.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

3mo newer
Seed 2.1 Turbo

Jun 24, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.1 Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Seed 2.1 Turbo.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 43.2. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Seed 2.1 Turbo is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Seed 2.1 Turbo in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Seed 2.1 Turbo scores CharXiv-D: 94.6%, MathVision: 92.7%, MathVista: 90.5%, MathVerse: 89.2%, Video-MME: 89.0%.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.7 vs 43.2), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Seed 2.1 Turbo is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons