Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
Comparing Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Reflection AI · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Beam 1.0 is roughly 13.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Beam 1.0
- cost matters — it's about 13.1x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
- you want predictable pricing at $3.50/M input and $21.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 1 for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Livedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 8.8x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live ($3.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 17.5x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live ($21.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live is more expensive than Beam 1.0.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Beam 1.0 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Beam 1.0 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Beam 1.0
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
License
Usage and distribution terms
Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live was released on 2026-08-26.
Beam 1.0 is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live.
Oct 16, 2026
6 days ago
1mo newerAug 26, 2026
1 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live is available from Google.
Beam 1.0
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live.
Related comparisons
More Beam 1.0 comparisons
More Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live comparisons
- Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs Mercury 3
- Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs Muse Spark Open
- Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)