Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Ember-1
Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 5.2. Claude 3.5 Haiku is 3.8x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Fireworks AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 5.2, ranking #51 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ember-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is roughly 3.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
- cost matters — it's about 3.8x cheaper per token
Choose Ember-1
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 4 for Ember-1
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ember-1 is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).
Ember-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 3.8x cheaper than Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 3.8x cheaper than Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23.
Ember-1 is 23 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Oct 22, 2024
2.0 years ago
Sep 23, 2026
2 weeks ago
1.9yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Ember-1 is available from Fireworks.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Ember-1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Ember-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Ember-1.