The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

Comparing Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Claude Haiku 5.5 is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok-4 Fast Reasoning also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,000,000
2,000,000

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 0 for Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Grok-4 Fast Reasoning ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) costs the same as Grok-4 Fast Reasoning ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-4 Fast Reasoning is more expensive than Claude Haiku 5.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerAnthropic
xAI
Grok-4 Fast Reasoning
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4 Fast Reasoning accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 5.5's 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-4 Fast Reasoning is limited to 30,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-4 Fast Reasoning
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while Grok-4 Fast Reasoning was released on 2025-08-28.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 14 months newer than Grok-4 Fast Reasoning.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.1yr newer
Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Grok-4 Fast Reasoning's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-4 Fast Reasoning's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Grok-4 Fast Reasoning is available from xAI.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Grok-4 Fast Reasoning

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
Grok-4 Fast Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Grok-4 Fast Reasoning.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Grok-4 Fast Reasoning?

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to Grok-4 Fast Reasoning in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Grok-4 Fast Reasoning?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via anthropic. Grok-4 Fast Reasoning costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning supports 2.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 2.0M), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Grok-4 Fast Reasoning is developed by xAI.