The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 30.6. MiMo-V2-Flash is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 30.6, ranking #19 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Haiku 5.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Haiku 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
MiMo-V2-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.0
#19
30.6
#133
Reasoning
47.2
#27
30.8
#129
Coding
40.2
#13
17.3
#132
Agents
33.3
#28
8.1
#149
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
1,000,000
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Haiku 5.5
MiMo-V2-Flash
Math
25.7#110
29.4#89
Tool use
20.3#59
6.2#158
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

36 reported for Claude Haiku 5.5 · 15 for MiMo-V2-Flash

1 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 5.5 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Claude Haiku 5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 5.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 5.5 was released on 2026-10-07, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 10 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Oct 7, 2026

1 days ago

9mo newer
MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 5.5's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Jun 2026

MiMo-V2-Flash

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 5.5 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Claude Haiku 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Haiku 5.5
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 30.6. Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Haiku 5.5 compare to MiMo-V2-Flash in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores Global-MMLU: 87.8%, MILU: 87.6%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 87.0%, Chartography: 86.2%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 83.7%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Both models cost $0.10 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 30.6), context window (1.0M vs 256K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons