The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 30.6.

InclusionAI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 30.6, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
MiMo-V2-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
30.6
#133
Reasoning
47.5
#26
30.8
#129
Coding
38.8
#18
17.3
#132
Agents
38.0
#12
8.1
#149
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.1 Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash
Tool use
29.0#16
6.2#158
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 15 for MiMo-V2-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

251.0B diff

Ling 3.1 Flash has 251.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2-Flash, making it 81.2% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
309.0Bparameters
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash
309.0B
MiMo-V2-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 10 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

9mo newer
MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 30.6. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to MiMo-V2-Flash in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 30.6), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons