Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 30.6. MiMo-V2-Flash is 40.0x cheaper per token.

Fireworks AI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 30.6, ranking #51 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ember-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 40.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ember-1 also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash

cost matters — it's about 40.0x cheaper per token
you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: MiMo-V2-Flash

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

43.1

#51 · 4 evals

Best

30.6

#133 · 15 evals

Reasoning

38.6

#72 · 3 evals

Best

30.8

#129 · 14 evals

Coding

37.0

#22 · 3 evals

Best

17.3

#132 · 4 evals

Agents

29.7

#44 · 2 evals

Best

8.1

#149 · 4 evals

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

1 of 1

Best

0 of 1

Input price

$3.00 / M

$0.10 / M

Best

Output price

$15.00 / M

$0.30 / M

Best

Context window

1,040,000

Best

256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared

Index

Ember-1

MiMo-V2-Flash

Tool use

15.9#94 · 2 evals

6.2#158 · 2 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 15 for MiMo-V2-Flash

1 shared

Ember-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ember-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Ember-1 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ember-1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Ember-1 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Ember-1

Input tokens$3.00

Output tokens$15.00

Best providerFireworks

MiMo-V2-Flash

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerXiaomi

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2471.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2471.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2-Flash, making it 799.7% larger.

Ember-1

2.8Tparameters

MiMo-V2-Flash

309.0Bparameters

2780.0B

Ember-1

309.0B

MiMo-V2-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ember-1 accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Ember-1

Input1,040,000 tokens

Output- tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash

Input256,000 tokens

Output16,384 tokens

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

Ember-1 is 9 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

9mo newer

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ember-1 is available from Fireworks. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Ember-1

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

Xiaomi

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1

✓ Preferred

MiMo-V2-Flash

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash.

Which is better, Ember-1 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 30.6. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to MiMo-V2-Flash in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.

Is Ember-1 cheaper than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is 30.0x cheaper for input tokens. Ember-1 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via fireworks. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 30.6), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash