The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -6.2.

Anthropic · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -6.2, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
-6.2
#407
Reasoning
53.6
#7
-6.2
#397
Coding
44.6
#5
2.8
#263
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Claude Mythos 5.2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Mythos 5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 19 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Mythos 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to -6.2. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs -6.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons