The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Muse Ember

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to -6.2.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to -6.2, ranking #47 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Ember

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Muse Ember
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-6.2
#407
45.9
#47
Reasoning
-6.2
#397
48.1
#24
Coding
2.8
#263
27.3
#85
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 6 for Muse Ember

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Emberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Ember specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Ember specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Ember
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Ember supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Muse Ember can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Ember

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Ember uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Ember

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09.

Muse Ember is 19 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Ember

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Ember side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Muse Ember
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Muse Ember.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Muse Ember?

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to -6.2. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Muse Ember is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Muse Ember in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Muse Ember scores PerceptionBench: 80.6%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 69.5%, Agents' Last Exam: 61.6%, Personal Superintelligence Index: 46.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 40.9%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Ember?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Ember supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Ember?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.2 vs 45.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Muse Ember?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Muse Ember is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons