The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Sarvam-105B

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 24.8.

Anthropic · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 24.8, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Mythos 5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.6 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Mythos 5.2
Anthropic
Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.6
#2
24.8
#200
Reasoning
53.6
#7
25.3
#191
Coding
44.6
#5
-2.0
#291
Agents
44.1
#2
3.9
#195
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude Mythos 5.2 · 14 for Sarvam-105B

No common benchmarks found

Claude Mythos 5.2 and Sarvam-105Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Mythos 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Claude Mythos 5.2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Mythos 5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Mythos 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Claude Mythos 5.2 is 8 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

8mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Mythos 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Sarvam-105B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Mythos 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Sarvam-105B's cutoff date.

Claude Mythos 5.2

Jun 2026

Sarvam-105B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Mythos 5.2 and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Mythos 5.2
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.2 or Sarvam-105B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.6 to 24.8. Claude Mythos 5.2 is made by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Mythos 5.2 compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Claude Mythos 5.2 scores De novo protein binder design: 85.1%, Biomedical image analysis: 80.7%, Protocols Troubleshooting: 77.1%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 75.3%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.5%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Mythos 5.2 and Sarvam-105B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 supports 1.0M tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Mythos 5.2 and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.6 vs 24.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Mythos 5.2 and Sarvam-105B?

Claude Mythos 5.2 is developed by Anthropic and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.

Related comparisons