Claude Fable 5.2 vs Sarvam-105B
Claude Fable 5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 61.1 to 24.8.
Anthropic · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Fable 5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 61.1 to 24.8, ranking #1 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Fable 5.2 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Fable 5.2
- overall performance matters — it scores 61.1 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose Sarvam-105B
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
29 reported for Claude Fable 5.2 · 14 for Sarvam-105B
Claude Fable 5.2 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Sarvam-105B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Claude Fable 5.2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Fable 5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Fable 5.2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.
Claude Fable 5.2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Fable 5.2
Sarvam-105B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Fable 5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Fable 5.2 was released on 2026-11-09, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.
Claude Fable 5.2 is 8 months newer than Sarvam-105B.
Nov 9, 2026
3 days ago
8mo newerMar 6, 2026
8 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Fable 5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Sarvam-105B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Fable 5.2's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Sarvam-105B's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.2 and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Fable 5.2 vs Sarvam-105B.