The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Ember vs Sarvam-105B

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 24.8.

Meta · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 24.8, ranking #47 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Ember

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Ember
Meta
Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.9
#47
24.8
#200
Reasoning
48.1
#24
25.3
#191
Coding
27.3
#86
-2.0
#291
Agents
31.6
#45
3.9
#194
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Muse Ember · 14 for Sarvam-105B

No common benchmarks found

Muse Ember and Sarvam-105Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Ember specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Ember specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Meta
Muse Ember
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Ember supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Muse Ember can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Ember

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Ember is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Ember

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Muse Ember is 8 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Muse Ember

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

8mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Ember and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Ember
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Ember vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Muse Ember or Sarvam-105B?

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 24.8. Muse Ember is made by Meta and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Ember compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Muse Ember scores PerceptionBench: 80.6%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 69.5%, Agents' Last Exam: 61.6%, Personal Superintelligence Index: 46.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 40.9%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Ember and Sarvam-105B?

Muse Ember supports 1.0M tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Ember and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.9 vs 24.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Ember and Sarvam-105B?

Muse Ember is developed by Meta and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.

Related comparisons