The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Claude Opus 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.6 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 25.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 4.7 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.6 to 35.0, ranking #52 overall.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 7; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 25.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 4.7 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.6 and ranks #52 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 7 of 7 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 25.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.6
#52
35.0
#108
Reasoning
45.4
#36
36.2
#94
Coding
35.0
#30
21.0
#108
Agents
30.3
#44
16.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
7 of 7
0 of 7
Input price
$5.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

5 shared
Index
Claude Opus 4.7
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Math
39.3#20
28.1#101
Vision
33.2#22
20.3#86
Tool use
24.7#37
11.0#133
Long context
8.6#85
22.9#17
Multimodal
31.4#32
22.0#76
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Claude Opus 4.7 · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

7 shared

Claude Opus 4.7 outperforms in 7 benchmarks (BrowseComp, CharXiv-R, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.7 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.7 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.7 is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.7 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.7 was released on 2026-04-16, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 6 months newer than Claude Opus 4.7.

Claude Opus 4.7

Apr 16, 2026

6 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.7 is available from Anthropic, DeepInfra, Vertex AI. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Opus 4.7

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
vertex logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.7
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Claude Opus 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.6 to 35.0. Claude Opus 4.7 is made by Anthropic and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 4.7 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores GPQA: 94.2%, MMMLU: 91.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 87.6%, BrowseComp: 79.3%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.6 vs 35.0), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Claude Opus 4.7 is developed by Anthropic and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons